For Australian law students

Ask a question about Australian law. Open every case in the answer.

CaseSharp searches 73,000 audited Australian decisions and answers in plain English, with every claim pinned to the paragraph it came from. Click any citation and you are reading the judgment. Then turn what you found into an IRAC brief with AGLC4 footnotes that will not cost you marks.

ChatGPT can cite cases that do not exist. AustLII is free, but you read every judgment yourself. CaseSharp answers in plain English and links every case to the paragraph it came from.

The free plan does not expire and does not need a card. Built in Sydney, with the core app and your data on Australian infrastructure.

When must a doctor warn a patient about a risk?

A medical practitioner has a duty to warn a patient of a material risk in proposed treatment, judged by what this patient would think significant rather than by professional practice alone.

Rogers v Whitaker[1992] HCA 58AvailableOpens the judgment at the cited paragraph
Coverage to 30 April 2026Check every authority before you rely on it
An example of the answer surface. Every citation is a link into the judgment.

73,000 audited Australian decisions

73,000 audited decisions across federal, state and territory courts. Current to the end of April 2026.

All eleven Priestley subjects

Criminal, Torts, Contracts, Property, Equity and Trusts, Corporations, Administrative, Constitutional, Civil Procedure, Evidence, and Ethics. The eleven every Australian law school has to teach.

Sharp, the answer engine, tells you when it does not know

If there is no authority to support an answer, it says so and shows you what it did find. It does not invent a case to fill the gap.

Before the tute

Brief three cases before Tuesday, not one.

Reading two hundred pages to find the one paragraph that matters is most of what first semester is. Give CaseSharp a case and it produces a structured brief: material facts, the issue, the rule, how it was applied, and what was held, with every point linked back to the paragraph it came from. You still read the judgment. You just stop spending forty minutes working out where in it to start.

  • Material factsat [3] to [11]
  • Issueat [14]
  • Ruleat [21]
  • Applicationat [24] to [30]
  • Heldat [41]
An IRAC brief, with each part linked to the paragraph it came from.

Problem questions

Find the authority, then see what cites it.

Ask Sharp a question the way you would ask a tutor and you get an answer in IRAC structure with the authorities attached. Open any one and you get its citation graph: the cases that cite it and the cases it cites, ranked by influence, so you can see which later authorities carry weight and open them yourself. Filter by court, jurisdiction, year and area when you need the binding line rather than the interesting one. Every citation opens the judgment at the paragraph, so you can check the point before you rely on it.

Narrow the answer

CourtJurisdictionYearArea

Cited by

Most influential first
  • A later High Court decisionLandmark authority
  • A Full Federal Court decisionFrequently cited
  • A State Court of Appeal decisionCited occasionally
The citation graph on an authority: which cases cite it, ranked by influence. It ranks the later cases, it does not label them good or bad law.

Research essays

Footnotes that do not cost you marks.

AGLC4 is marked, and forty footnotes at midnight is where the marks quietly disappear. Paste a case or a section and CaseSharp returns the full form and the short form, with pinpoints, ready to paste into your footnotes. When a reference is ambiguous it tells you it needs manual review instead of guessing, because a confident wrong citation is worse than no citation.

Full form

Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479, 490.

Short form

Rogers v Whitaker (n 1) 490.

Needs manual review. The report series could not be resolved from what you pasted.
Full form, short form, and an explicit manual-review state when a reference cannot be parsed.

SWOTVAC

Walk into an open-book exam having checked your scaffold yourself.

A scaffold you built in week 4 is a liability by week 13 if a later court has moved the law since. Open each authority in your notes and CaseSharp shows you its citation graph: the cases that have cited it, most influential first, each one a click from the judgment. It does not label a case as still good law. It puts the later cases in front of you so you can read them and decide. Then drill with timed questions or IRAC practice in the weeks before the paper, so the structure is automatic by the time it counts.

  • Authority 1Landmark authorityCiting cases linked
  • Authority 2Frequently citedCiting cases linked
  • Authority 3Cited occasionallyCiting cases linked
An illustration of a scaffold check. Each authority links to the cases that cite it, so you can read the later law yourself.

You can already ask ChatGPT about Australian law. Here is what is different.

Plenty of law students use both, and that is a reasonable thing to do. The difference is not that one is smart and the other is not. It is where the answer comes from and whether you can check it without doing the work twice.

Where the answer comes from

CaseSharp

A corpus of 73,000 audited Australian decisions, searched at the moment you ask

ChatGPT

A general model, answering from what it learned in training plus anything it retrieves in the session

Checking a citation

CaseSharp

Every citation is a link to the paragraph it came from. Click it and you are reading the judgment

ChatGPT

You copy the case name into AustLII or Jade and check it yourself, one at a time

When there is no authority

CaseSharp

Sharp says it cannot find support and shows you what it did find

ChatGPT

It will usually still produce an answer

Citation graph

CaseSharp

Every authority carries a citation graph: the cases that cite it and the cases it cites, ranked by influence, so you can open the later cases and read them yourself

ChatGPT

No Australian citation graph by default, so it cannot show you which later cases have cited an authority

AGLC4

CaseSharp

Full form, short form and pinpoints, flagged for manual review when a reference cannot be parsed

ChatGPT

Formatting varies between answers and pinpoint rules are not reliable

Australian coverage

CaseSharp

Australian decisions and legislation only, which is the point

ChatGPT

General purpose across every jurisdiction. Australian material sits alongside everything else rather than being the whole of it

Cost

CaseSharp

A free plan that does not expire, or A$49 a month, or A$470 billed annually

ChatGPT

There is a free tier and there are paid tiers. Check ChatGPT's current Australian pricing on their site

Where ChatGPT is still better.

Explaining a concept from scratch, drafting anything that is not legal writing, working through non-legal subjects, and thinking out loud at 1am. It is a better generalist than CaseSharp will ever be. What it cannot do is show you the paragraph.

Built for the rules your law school already has.

Australian law schools treat undisclosed AI use as academic misconduct, and a finding has to be disclosed to the admissions board when you apply to be admitted. That is a serious thing to risk on a tool that cannot show you where its answers came from.

CaseSharp is built the other way around. Nothing it produces is an answer you hand in. Every claim resolves to a paragraph of a real judgment, every substantive output carries a human-review notice, and when there is no authority to support something, Sharp says so instead of filling the gap.

Read our verification standard

Start on the free plan. It does not expire.

Two plans, both in Australian dollars. The free plan is permanent, not a trial, and it does not ask for a card.

Free

A$0

No card. Does not expire.

  • Search all 73,000 decisions
  • Read any judgment, with pinpoint links
  • 3 Sharp questions and 1 IRAC brief, in total, not per month
  • 3 authority packets, 3 folders and 5 downloads, in total

Pro

A$49a month

Or A$470 billed annually, about A$39 a month.

  • Sharp in all three modes, up to 100 questions a day
  • Unlimited IRAC briefs and authority packets
  • AGLC4 full form and short form with pinpoints
  • Citation alerts and saved searches

Student pricing is on the way.

See what is in each plan

Questions students actually ask.

Will using CaseSharp breach my university's academic integrity rules?

Not by itself, but the rules are set by your university and often by the individual subject convenor, so check the policy for each assessment. CaseSharp is a research and study tool: it finds authority, shows you where it came from, and helps you structure and cite your own work. It does not write assignments. Where your subject permits AI use with disclosure, disclose it, and keep the record of what you used it for.

Can it just write my assignment?

No, and that is deliberate. Sharp answers questions about the law and produces briefs and citations from real judgments. It will not write your problem question answer or your research essay, because handing in generated work is the thing that gets students in front of a misconduct panel and follows them to the admissions board. The work it saves you is the searching and the formatting, not the thinking.

How do I know the cases it cites are real?

Open them. Every citation in every answer is a link into the judgment at the paragraph the claim came from, so verifying a case takes one click rather than a separate search. If Sharp cannot find authority for something, it tells you that instead of producing a citation to fill the gap. You should still read the cases you rely on, and every substantive answer says so.

How current is the case law?

The corpus covers 73,000 audited Australian decisions and is current to the end of April 2026. Judgments handed down after that date are not in it yet, so for anything very recent, check AustLII or your library database as well. We publish the coverage date in the footer and update it when the corpus is extended.

My university already gives me Lexis+ and Westlaw for free. Why would I pay for this?

Because they are excellent at a different job. Lexis+ AU and Westlaw are practitioner research platforms with deep commentary and authorised reports, and if you need those, use them, they are already paid for. They were not built to brief a case for a tutorial, format AGLC4 footnotes, check the citing cases behind a scaffold, or work in the ten minutes before class. That is what CaseSharp is for, and most students who pay for it keep using their library databases too.

A$49 a month is real money. What am I actually getting?

One paid plan, covering all eleven Priestley subjects, for as long as you keep it. Concretely: Sharp in all three modes, IRAC briefs, AGLC4 citations in full and short form with pinpoints, the citation graph on the cases in your notes, saved searches and authority packets. Annually it is A$470, which works out at about A$39 a month. If that is more than you need, the free plan is permanent and does not ask for a card. Student pricing is on the way.

Can I use it during an open-book exam?

That depends entirely on your university and your subject, and most exam rules restrict what you can have open. Assume you cannot unless your subject explicitly says you can. CaseSharp is built for the weeks before the exam: verifying your scaffold, drilling IRAC structure, and checking the cases that have cited the authorities in your notes.

Can I cancel over the summer?

Yes. Monthly plans cancel at the end of the billing period with no exit fee, and you keep everything you have saved. If you would rather not commit at all, the free plan is permanent, so you can stop paying over the break and keep your account, your notes and your saved authorities.

Does it work on my phone?

Yes. The reader, search and Sharp all work on a phone, which is the point: most tutorial reading happens on a train or in a twenty minute gap between classes, not at a desk. Longer work like building a brief or assembling an authority packet is easier on a laptop, but nothing is locked to desktop.

What happens when I graduate?

Your university logins stop working, usually within weeks, and the databases you spent four years learning go with them. Your CaseSharp account does not: everything you saved stays, the free plan does not expire, and you can keep or start a paid plan at the same price you were paying as a student. Nothing you have built disappears on the day your enrolment ends.

For law schools and law librarians

CaseSharp is built so that a student’s work can be checked: every claim in an answer resolves to a paragraph of a real judgment, AGLC4 output follows the fourth edition rules rather than approximating them, and the tool refuses rather than inventing authority when it cannot find support. We are interested in talking to faculties, law librarians and law student societies about research-skills teaching, library guide listings, and cohort access. We are equally interested in hearing where you think a tool like this should not be used.

Email hello@casesharp.ai

Researching Australian law from outside Australia

Australian case law is public, but getting at it from another jurisdiction usually means AustLII’s raw interface and a lot of manual cross-checking. CaseSharp works the same way from anywhere: search the corpus, read the judgment, see the citation graph of what cites a case and what it cites ranked by influence, and export citations in AGLC4. Comparative law researchers and postgraduate students are welcome on any plan.

Start with the case you are stuck on right now.

The free databases give you the documents. CaseSharp gives you the answer in plain English, structured in IRAC and cited in AGLC4, and it stays yours after you graduate. Setting up the free plan takes about thirty seconds, and it does not expire.